Why do teams keep missing delivery commitments?

Commitments are usually sized by hope or negotiation, not by honest probability. Meanwhile, focus drifts quietly, fragility piles up in the scoring zone, and the microbehaviours that would have predicted slippage go unacknowledged. The miss is almost never the surprise the dashboard suggests.

How soon should slippage be visible?

The behavioural signals — language, energy, consistency, momentum, engagement — are visible in the first few weeks of a cycle. Waiting for metrics to move is waiting too long. Find the Reds is the discipline of acting on those signals while change is still cheap.

The Problem

Missed Delivery Commitments

Another quarter. Another set of commitments that almost got there. Stakeholders are patient but not convinced. The team is tired but not lazy. So why does the pattern keep repeating?

Does this sound familiar?

Commitments repeatedly slipping at the end of the cycle
Low confidence in team estimates
Unfinished work rolling over cycle after cycle
Stakeholder trust quietly eroding
Nobody wants to give a number they'll be held to

You're not alone

If this feels familiar, it's because missed commitments are almost never caused by laziness or lack of talent. They're caused by fragility that was baked in before the cycle ever started — ambiguous problems, unstable decisions, bundled dependencies, and a focus that drifted quietly while nobody was watching.

The IMIRT response

How the plays address this

Three plays address this together. Find the Reds surfaces the microbehaviours that predict slippage weeks before dashboards catch up. Focus sizes commitments to a responsible level of risk — Must Haves at ≈5%, Next in Plan at ≈15% — so the number isn't hope, it's a responsible bet. Stack the Odds then strengthens the fragile items before they enter the scoring zone, using five moves to raise finishing odds.

Tease and gate

Get the complete plays with step-by-step guided exercises.

FAQ

Common questions

Why do teams keep missing delivery commitments?: Commitments are usually sized by hope or negotiation, not by honest probability. Meanwhile, focus drifts quietly, fragility piles up in the scoring zone, and the microbehaviours that would have predicted slippage go unacknowledged. The miss is almost never the surprise the dashboard suggests.
How soon should slippage be visible?: The behavioural signals — language, energy, consistency, momentum, engagement — are visible in the first few weeks of a cycle. Waiting for metrics to move is waiting too long. Find the Reds is the discipline of acting on those signals while change is still cheap.

Plays that address this problem

Run the plays

Run the plays. Free playbook.

Kieran sends the full PDF personally — no spam.